VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Payal W/o Arjun Thamir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.
1. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is identical, therefore, they are being heard and decided by this common order.
2. For proper adjudication of the case, the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13292/2020 (Payal Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Anr.) are being taken into consideration.
3. Briefly noted the facts in the present writ petition are that the respondents initiated the process of recruitment for appointment on the post of Safai Karmachari in accordance with Rajasthan Municipalities (Safai Employee Service) Rules, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules of 2012”) by issuing an advertisement dated 13.04.2018. A corrigendum to the advertisement dated 13.04.2018 was issued on 28.04.2018, whereby, the requirement of having counter signature of the Head of the Department on the experience certificate issued by a contractor/placement agency was dispensed with. Thereafter, an order dated 17.05.2018 was issued by the Department of Local Self Government providing guidelines for the above recruitment. The eligible persons including the petitioner submitted her candidature for the post of Safai Karamchari and on being found successful
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.