SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 449

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Shree Chandrashekhar, Kuldeep Mathur, JJ.
Abhishek Agrawal S/o Shri Suresh Agrawal - Appellant
Versus
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and ors. – Respondents
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 438/2024
Decided On : 16-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Manoj Bhandari Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Aniket Tater
For the Respondent: Ms. Abhilasha Bora

IMPORTANT POINT
The requirement for registration of a lease deed by a specified cut-off date is a critical eligibility criterion for LPG distributorship applications, and the execution date alone does not suffice to meet this requirement.

Headnote:

REGISTRATION - LPG DISTRIBUTORSHIP - Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1)(b), 32, 34, 47 - The court discussed the requirements for the registration of documents under the Registration Act, particularly focusing on the necessity of having a registered lease deed by a specified cut-off date for eligibility in the LPG distributorship application process. The court interpreted that while the execution date of a lease deed is significant, the requirement for registration by the cut-off date is mandatory for eligibility. The court upheld the BPCL's decision to reject the application based on non-compliance with these guidelines.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant challenged the BPCL's notice requiring a registered Power of Attorney and the rejection of his application for LPG distributorship due to the lease deed being registered after the cut-off date of 24th May 2023. The writ court partially accepted the appellant's arguments but upheld the rejection based on the lease deed registration date.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the lease deed was registered after the cut-off date, which was a clear violation of the eligibility criteria set forth in the Manual for Selection of LPG Distributors. The court emphasized that the appellant was aware of these requirements when submitting his application.

Issues: Whether the date of execution or the date of registration of the lease deed is relevant for eligibility in the LPG distributorship application process, and whether the BPCL's adherence to the guidelines was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the requirement for a registered lease deed by the cut-off date is mandatory and that the execution date does not negate the necessity for registration. The court reinforced that adherence to procedural guidelines by BPCL is essential and cannot be overlooked.

Final Decision: The Special Appeal was dismissed, affirming the writ court's decision to uphold BPCL's rejection of the appellant's application based on the late registration of the lease deed.

ORDER :

Shree Chandrashekhar, J.

Aggrieved by the order dated 22nd March 2024 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2932 of 2024, the writ petitioner has filed this Special Appeal under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules read with Article 225 of the Constitution of India.

2. Before the writ Court, a challenge was laid by the appellant to the notice dated 28th December 2023 requiring the appellant to provide registered Power of Attorney on or before 24th May 2023 and the order dated 06th February 2024 by which the appellant was intimated that the lease deed registered after the cut-off date, that is, after 24th May 2023 was not valid as per the guidelines for Selection of the LPG distributorship. Further prayers for a direction to the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, (in short, ‘BPCL’) to accept his application for award of LPG distributorship and for issuing a Letter of Intent (in short, ‘LOI’) in his favour were also made by him. The respondent-BPCL took a stand that in terms of the ‘Manual for Selection of LPG Distributorship’ the land document was required to be registered on or before the last date for submission of the application. This was also an objection raised by the BPCL that the Power of Attorney was required to be compulsorily registered under section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 and, therefore, the lease deed which was not registered prior to the extended last date, that is, on or before 24th May 2023 could not have been accepted.

3. The writ Court did not accept the objection raised by the BPCL as to the requirement for compulsory registration of the Power of Attorney and set aside that part of the order dated 28th December 2023. However, the writ Court did not agree with the appellant that the lease deed which was executed on 23rd March 2023 shall have effect from that date notwithstanding, its registration on a subsequent date, that is, on 27th May 2023. The writ Court held as under -

    “9. It is also seen from the Clause 4 of the application for appointment of LPG Distributorship (Annexure-2) filled by the petitioner for allotment of LPG distributorship wherein the Clause 31 of the ‘Manual for Selection of LPG Distributors’ is reiterated regarding the condition of having a registered lease deed from the date of advertisement upto the last date of submission of application form and the petitioner filled the said application for appointment of LPG Distributorship with open eyes and was well aware that he was not fulfilling the eligibility criteria as stipulated in the application. The petitioner despite knowing that he does not have the eligibility in light of Clause 31 of the Manual and Clause 4 of the Application participated in the process. The petitioner has also not given challenge to both the conditions mentioned in the Clause 31 of the ‘Manual for Selection of LPG Distributors’ and Clause 4 of the ‘Application for Appointment of LPG Distributors’ The Clause 4 of the application form is reproduced hereas under -

“provide following details of the plot(s) of land for construction of LPG godown owned or having registered lease for minimum 15 years (4 years 11 months for locations falling under CNT act in Jharkhand) in the name of applicant/member of Family Unit commencing on any date from the date of advertisement up to the last date of submission of application as specified either in the advertisement or in the Corrigendum (if any) and meeting the norms specified.”

20. As discussed above the lease-deed produced by the petitioner qua godown has been registered on 30.05.2023 i.e. much after the last date for receipt of the application i.e. 24.05.2023 and the lease deed qua showroom, was registered on 27.05.2023, which is also after the last date for receipt of the application thus, the decision of the respondents that the land offered by the petitioner is not meeting the eligibility conditions/requirements as stipulated in the advertisement/brochure as per the ‘Manual for Selection of LPG Distri

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top