IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
Chandra Prakash Bhardwaj, S/o Shri Kailash Bhardwaj - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Department and Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8393 Of 2022
Decided On : 01-07-2024
Selection - Assistant Drug Analyst - Article 226(3), Section 20 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - The court found the selection of the respondent under EWS category illegal due to lack of valid experience certificate as mandated by the advertisement.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the selection of the respondent for the post of Assistant Drug Analyst under the EWS category, claiming the respondent was initially categorized as General and lacked the required experience certificate.
Finding of the Court:
The court determined that the respondent's experience certificate was invalid as it did not meet the advertisement's requirements, leading to the conclusion that the selection was arbitrary.
Issues: Whether the respondent belongs to the EWS category and possesses the requisite qualifications and experience as per the advertisement's terms.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the experience certificate must be issued by a Government Analyst as per the advertisement's requirements, which the respondent failed to provide.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, and the selection of the respondent is set aside.
ORDER :
(Ganesh Ram Meena, J.) :
1. This writ petition was listed before the Court on 31.05.2024 for orders on an application filed by the respondents under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for vacation of the ex-parte order dated 30.06.2022.
2. Considering the issue raised in the writ petition and with the consent of the counsel appearing for the respective parties, the matter was heard for final disposal and the order was reserved.
3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-
(ii) By appropriate Writ, Order of Direction, direct the Respondents to Select and Appoint the Petitioner on the post of Assistant Drug Analyst under the EWS Category.
(iii) By appropriate Writ, Order of Direction, hold and declare that the Respondent Suneel Kumar is ineligible to be selected on the post of Assistant Drug Analyst, as per the Terms & Conditions of the Advertisement dated 10.01.2022 and the Information Book-Let, issued by the Respondents.”
4. The facts borne out from the pleadings are that the respondent No.2 -Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (for short ‘the RUHS’) issued an advertisement dated 10.01.2022 for inviting applications from the eligible candidates for recruitment to the post of Assistant Drug Analyst. As per the advertisement, one vacancy out of total 11 vacancies was available for EWS category candidates. The last date for submitting the application forms was fixed as 02.02.2022 and Online examination was scheduled to be held on 10.02.2022.
5. The petitioner Chandra Prakash Bhardwaj as well as the respondent No.4- Suneel Kumar submitted their Online applications under the EWS Category.
6. After holding Online examination, the respondents issued the provisional result after scrutiny of the documents and as per the provisional result (Annex.3), the petitioner Chandra Prakash Bhardwaj secured 64 marks and the respondent No.4- Suneel Kumaar secured 65 marks. In the provisional result (Annex.3), the category of the petitioner Chandra Prakash Bhardwaj was mentioned as ‘EWS’ and the category of respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar was mentioned as ‘General’. The respondents issued a revised provisional list of selected candidates on 25.05.2022 (Annex.4) wherein the respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar was declared selected under the EWS Category and the petitioner was placed at S.No.1 in the waiting list for EWS Category.
7. Aggrieved by the selection of respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar for the post of Assistant Drug Analyst against the vacancy reserved for EWS Category, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
8. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that after verification of the documents, the respondents declared the result (Annex.3) wherein the result of the respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar was declared under the General Category and the result of the petitioner Chandra Prakash Bhardwaj was declared under the EWS Category but later on in an arbitrary manner the respondents have declared selected the respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar against the single vacancy of EWS Category and placed the petitioner in the waiting list.
9. Counsel also raised a dispute regarding the eligibility of respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar saying that he is not having the requisite experience of Analyst of Drug in Laboratories under the Government as required under the terms and conditions of the advertisement and has not placed on record the experience certificate issued by the Authority as required in a prescribed format and issued under the signatures of the Government Analyst. Counsel also submitted that the respondent No.4 Suneel Kumar has secured PG Degree in Pharmacy in the year 2010 whereas during the period from 09.09.2009 to 30.04.20
A valid experience certificate from a Government Analyst is mandatory for eligibility in recruitment as per the advertisement's terms.
The court held that procedural strictness in recruitment must be balanced with fairness, allowing exceptions for valid experience certificates issued by authorized personnel even if not counter signe....
The absence of a valid UT-format EWS certificate invalidates the selection under EWS category per prescribed eligibility criteria.
Inaction on false representation affects rightful appointment; timely adjudication on eligibility is imperative to uphold integrity in employment processes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.