IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Laxman Singh @ Bunty S/o Shri Prem Singh and ors – Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP and ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 568/2019
Decided On : 23-04-2024
Cognizance - Criminal Procedure - Cr.P.C. Sections 193, 209, 362, 397, 401 - The court discussed the principles of cognizance under the Cr.P.C., emphasizing that cognizance can only be taken once by either the Magistrate or the Sessions Court, and reiterated the conditions under which a Sessions Court can take cognizance of offences against uncharged accused.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged the Additional Sessions Judge's order taking cognizance against them for various IPC offences after a prior cognizance was taken by a Magistrate against some of the same accused.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the cognizance taken against the petitioners not previously charged, while quashing the cognizance against those already charged, stating that taking cognizance twice for the same accused is impermissible.
Issues: Whether the Additional Sessions Judge could take cognizance against the petitioners after a prior cognizance was already taken by the Magistrate.
Ratio Decidendi: Cognizance can only be taken once by either the Magistrate or the Sessions Court, and the Sessions Court has the authority to take cognizance of uncharged accused based on prima facie evidence.
Result: The court quashed the order for petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and upheld the order for petitioner Nos.4 to 9.
ORDER :
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J.
Cognizance & Objectives of Criminal Procedure:-
This part of law is substantive law but for implementing it someone is to be authorized who can punish the guilty by adopting certain specified procedure. This aspect is dealt with by other part of law, i.e., procedural law.
Procedural law provides machinery for the implementation of substantive criminal law. In absence of procedural laws, the substantive laws are of no use. Without it no one will be able to know the way how the offenders will be prosecuted and by whom. In fact both the laws are complementary to each other. The procedural law is contained in Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The main objective of criminal procedure is to provide a fair trial to the accused by taking into consideration the principles of natural justice and to carry out the spirit of Article 22 of the Constitution. There are various processes that need to be followed to administer justice. It includes pre-trial procedure and procedures for various trials. Trial procedure is initiated by taking cognizance of offence and then by beginning proceedings and finally arriving a decision by following the procedure laid in the code.
The word cognizance has its origin from the old French term “connaissance” which means “recognition, wisdom, knowledge, familiarity” and also from the word “conoistre” which means “to know”. It is also derived from the Latin word “cognosis” where the con means to “with” and “gnosis” means “to know”.
The word ‘cognizance’ has not been defined in the criminal procedure code, but the meaning of cognizance is derived from the number of precedents and judicial pronouncements. The dictionary meaning of cognizance is “taking account of”, “taking note of”, “to gain knowledge about”, “to have knowledge regarding something”.
Lexicon Webster’s Dictionary, defines the word cognizance as, “The range of mental observation or awareness, the fact of being aware, knowledge, (Law) the powers given to a Court to deal with a given matter, jurisdiction.”
The meaning of Cognizance given in Black’s Law Dictionary, reads as under, Cognizance:- Jurisdiction, or the exercise of jurisdiction, or power to try and determine causes; judicial examination of a matter, or power and authority to make it.
“Cognizance” in general means ‘knowledge’ or ‘notice’, and ‘taking cognizance of offence’ means taking notice, or becoming aware of the alleged commission of an offence. The Court will have to take cognizance of the offence before it could proceed with the conduct of the trial. Taking cognizance does not involve any kind of formal action but occurs as soon a Magistrate applies his mind to the suspected commission of an offence for the purpose of legal proceedings. So, taking cognizance is the application of judicial mind.”[Article on “Cognizance of Offences” written by Mr. Pradeep Mehta, Faculty Member Chandigarh Judicial Academy]
Factual Matrix:-
1. Invoking the revisional jurisdiction, contained under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C., the petitioners have approached this Court assailing the validity and legality of the impugned order dated 11.02.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.17, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, in Sessions Case No.9/2018 by which the application filed by the complainant-respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the complainant”) under Section
Balveer Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2016 AIR (SC) 2266
Balveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (2016) 6 SCC 680
Kishori Singh Vs. State of Bihar (2004) 13 SCC 11
Kishun Singh Vs. State of Bihar (1993) 2 SCC 16
M/s Swil Ltd. Vs. State of Delhi and Anr. (2001) 6 SCC 670
R.N. Agarwal Vs. R. C. Bansal (2015) 1 SCC 48.
Cognizance of an offence can only be taken once, and the Sessions Court can take cognizance of uncharged accused based on available evidence.
The Court of Sessions can take cognizance of offences against accused not charge-sheeted by the police after the case is committed to it, based on prima facie evidence.
It is settled that taking cognizance is a well-known but undefined concept in criminal jurisprudence. The Code of Criminal Procedure does not define word "cognizance". The dictionary meaning of the w....
Point of law : A summon is a process issued by a Court calling upon a person to appear before a Magistrate - It is used for purpose of notifying an individual of his legal obligation to appearbefore ....
The need for the Magistrate to apply judicial mind while taking cognizance of an offence and the requirement for fair and proper investigation as the primary duty of the Investigating Officer.
The Magistrate can take cognizance of a case independently of the conclusion arrived at by the investigating officer, based on the facts emerging from the investigation, as per the provisions of Sect....
A Magistrate must apply judicial mind when taking cognizance of an offence; failure to do so, especially through mechanical processes, renders the order invalid and subject to quashing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.