SHAMIM AHMED
Hamid Raza – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shamim Ahmed, J.)
1. Heard Ms. Suman Lata, learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. This Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred as ‘S.C./S.T. Act’) has been preferred against the impugned orders dated 08.01.2021 and 06.04.2019 passed by Court of learned Sessons Judge (Court No. 2), Raebareli, in Criminal Case No. 92 of 2019, State v. Hamid Raza, Case Crime No. 212 of 2018 under Sections 323,504,506, I.P.C. and Section 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha, and 3(2)5 of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Shivratganj, District Amethi, and Chargesheet No. A53 of 2018 dated 25.9.2018 submitted in the said case.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that on 03.09.2018 at 14:57 hrs. the opposite party no.2 lodged an F.I.R. against the appellant which was registered as Case Crime No. 0212 of 2018, under Sections 323,504,506, I.P.C. and Section 3(1)Da and 3(2)5 of S.C./S.T. Act.
4. As per the prosecution version of the F.I.R., when the opposite party no.2-Ramdaas was going to see the fields on 3.9.2018, the appellant came there, beaten him, ab
Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar
Abdul Rehman Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak
P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnatka
Bhushan Kumar and Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.