RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Jaidev Bishnoi & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6902/2020
Decided On : 26-10-2021
Promotion - Forest Service - Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2015 - The court interpreted the provisions regarding promotion and seniority, concluding that the centralized promotion process was lawful and did not violate the rules.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, direct recruits as Forest Guards, challenged the transfer of Assistant Forester posts and the decision to centralize promotions, arguing it violated the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2015.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rules did not mandate division-level promotions for Assistant Foresters and upheld the state's decision to centralize the promotion process.
Issues: Whether the promotion process for Assistant Foresters must be conducted at the division level as per the Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2015.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the rules allow for promotions to be centralized and do not require division-level promotions, thus validating the state's actions.
Result: The petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT
1. In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. The matter came up on the second stay petition; however, after detailed arguments and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter was being heard finally.
3. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are direct recruits on the post of Forest Guard and were appointed on 02.12.2016, as per the provisions of Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 2015').
Learned counsel further submitted that the selection on the post of Forest Guard has been made 100% by way of direct recruitment.
Learned counsel also submitted that the next promotional post from Forest Guard is Assistant Forester, and the said post is to be filled 100% by way of promotion from amongst the Forest Guard.
Learned counsel further submitted that the appointing authority of the petitioners is the Deputy Conservator of Forests, and their seniority is required to be determined and promotions are required to be made at the division level.
Learned counsel also submitted that the post of Assistant Forester also required to be determined at the division level and each division is having a separate number of posts of Assistant Forester.
Learned counsel further submitted that vide order dated 12.02.2020, the respondents an order regarding distribution of the posts, according to the position as on 01.02.2020.
Learned counsel also submitted that the promotion from the post of Forest Guard to Assistant Forester on division basis and seniority of Forest Guard also maintained at division level.
Learned counsel further submitted that the respondent No.1, vide order dated 29.04.2020, transferred some posts of Assistant Forester from one division to another division on the ground that in some of the forest division, Forest Guards, who have been appointed in the year 1992, have not been promoted on the post of Assistant Forester; but in some forest divisions, where the Forest Guard appointed in the year 2011, were promoted on the post of Assistant Forester.
Learned counsel also submitted that till date, as per the provisions of the Rules of 2015, the seniority list of Forest Guard and Assistant Forester is being maintained at division level and promotion has also been made on the basis of seniority at the division level, but vide letter dated 31.07.2020, the respondent No.2 issued a direction for constituting a committee for the purpose of maintaining the seniority on centralized basis instead of decentralized one.
Learned counsel further submitted that the criteria, eligibility and procedure for promotion and seniority is prescribed under Rules 37 & 42 of the Rules of 2015. The relevant portion of the said Rules, as
It is also settled that employer has a right to determine transparent, fair and impartial criteria for selection to a post through appointment or by way of promotion.
Seniority list of Forest Guards is to be prepared by Chief Conservator of Forests, for purpose of promotion to posts of Deputy Forest Rangers, on basis of length of service in grade.
The court emphasized the principles of natural justice, good conscience, and equity in the preparation of the seniority list for promotion, and ruled that the service rendered by promotees on account....
Retired employees cannot claim promotion after cessation of service if eligibility is determined by the date of the DPC meeting.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.