JUDGMENT

1. Since the controversy involved in both the matters is one and same and arguments were also made simultaneously by the respective parties, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and have also carefully gone through the record.

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2355/2018:-

3. By way of the present Civil Misc. Appeal, the appellants have prayed for the following reliefs:-

"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow the appeal and kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the judgment and decree dated 04.12.2017 passed by the Additional District Judge No.7, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur in Arbitration Case No.13/2013 (CIS No.1216/2014) and be pleased to restore the Award dated 15.10.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Claim Case No.130/2012 to meets the ends of justice.

Any other direction or order which your Lordships deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the appellant-Corporation be kindly passed."

4. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that on 30.07.2007, applications/tenders were invited