ANAND PATHAK
Om Sai Rk Constructions Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Forsight Infractech Private Limited – Respondent
ORDER
1. Present application is preferred by applicant under Section Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for appointment of arbitrator.
2. Reliefs prayed for are as under:-
'(i) Annulling appointment of arbitrator vide letter dated 24.12.2020 (Annexure A-4).
(ii) Appointing an impartial arbitrator to resolve claims of the applicant.
(iii). Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court finds appropriate in the matter.
(iv) Costs.'
3. Precisely stated facts of the case are that applicant is a company registered under Companies Act and filed this application through its Director. Applicant is a construction company having expertise in construction of high rise buildings and hereinafter would be referred to as Subcontractor. Respondent is also a company registered under Companies Act and represented through its Director Ms. Upasana Agrawal. Respondent is also engaged in construction work of high rise buildings and hereinafter would be referred to as Contractor.
4. applicant/Subcontractor through its Director Rajesh Kumar Kaushal entered into an agreement dated 2.3.2015 to construct residential township 'Emerald Greens' [Four Tower
Bharat Broadband Network Limited Vs. United Telecoms Ltd.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Others Vs. M/s Nortel Networks India Pvt.
Haryana Space Application Centre and Others vs. Pan India Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC & Others vs. HSCC (India) Limited
Pricol Ltd. v. Johnson Controls Enterprise Ltd. MANU/SC/1165/2014 : (2015) 4 SCC 177
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of an arbitrator must be in accordance with the law, and if found to be invalid, the court has the jurisdiction to set it asid....
Appointment of arbitrator by designation is permissible. Arbitration clauses in government contracts providing that an employee of the department will be the sole arbitrator are neither void nor unen....
Point of Law : S.13(2) provides that a party who intends to challenge appointment of an arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal or afte....
The court affirmed that the claimant must secure the necessary Airport Entry Permits and upheld the arbitration award, ruling no breach by the respondent; consent regarding the arbitrator's appointme....
An arbitrator's mandate can be terminated when they fail to act without undue delay; new appointments must ensure impartiality as per updated legal standards.
The court emphasized the necessity for impartiality in arbitration, ruling that automatic appointments of arbitrators undermined the arbitration clause, rendering the award invalid.
The appointment of an arbitrator must comply with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly Section 12(5), which disqualifies certain individuals from serving as arbitrators.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.