SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2283

VIJAY BISHNOI
Ramchander – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
BR Chahar, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.91/2021 of Police Station Khatu Bari District Nagaur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 457, 380 IPC. He/She/They has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has submitted that offence(s) alleged to have been committed by the petitioner(s) is/are triable by Magistrate.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application(s).

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the fact that the alleged offence(s) levelled against the petitioner(s) is/are triable by Magistrate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed that petitioner(s) Ramchander S/o Dewa Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.91/2021 of Police Station Khatu Bari District Nagaur provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top