SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2160

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Kalu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Akash Goyal, Advocate, Mukhtiyar Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - The appeal, under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ?Act of 1989?), is preferred by appellant to assail impugned order dated 08.09.2021, passed by Special Court, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Pali (for short, ?learned trial Court?) rejecting his bail application.

2. Complainant lodged FIR No.52/2021, registered at Police Station Jaitaran, District Pali against appellant attributing offences under Sections 363, 366 & 376(D) IPC and Section 3(2)(w1), 3(2) (5) of the Act of 1989.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant prosecutrix "J" has levelled allegation of committing rape against co-accused Suresh, Aajad and two others and she has not named petitioner as an accused who committed rape with her. It is further stated that no test identification parade of the petitioner was conducted by police and he is not having any criminal antecedents. Lastly, learned counsel has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has already been filed and the trial will take its own time.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has oppose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top