SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2201

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Laddu Gopal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vijay Singh Poonia, Advocate, F.R. Meena, Advocate, Surendra Mahawar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.343/2020 registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence under Section 376-D IPC and Section(s) 3(1)(w)(i) & 3(1) (w)(ii) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ?the Act of 1989?) and later on for the offence under Section 376-D IPC and under Section(s) 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) & 3(2)(V) of the Act of 1989.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that he has falsely been implicated in this case wherein FIR has been lodged by a married major lady of 22 years of age with delay. Drawing attention of this Court towards the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., learned counsel submitted that she has levelled the allegation of rape which is based solely upon the video of the incident allegedly captured by co-accused in his mobile phone; but, no such video has been found in the mobile phone nor, charge sheet has been filed under the provision of Information and Technology Act, 2005. Learned counsel submitted th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top