SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2162

VIJAY BISHNOI
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shambhoo Singh, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.120/2021 of Police Station Kotwali, Sirohi for the offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation levelled against the petitioner of committing murder of his brother-in-law is false. It is argued from the statements of wife of the deceased Ritu, it is clear that the deceased was in drunken condition and had quarreled with the petitioner. He received some injuries and on account of that, he died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no intention to kill the deceased.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top