SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2272

VIJAY BISHNOI
Chailu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
JVS Deora, Advocate, Mool Singh Bhati, Advocate, Bherulal Jat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.107/2021 of Police Station Sri Balaji, Distt. Nagaur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 143, 341, 323, 365, 307, 308/34 IPC. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that allegation of attemting to commit murder of the complainant, levelled against the petitioners, is absolutely false. It is argued that as a matter of fact, a minor dispute arose between the parties, in which, the complainant had received simple injuries.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

5 .Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, after going through the case diary and keeping in view the fact that the injuries, for which, X-ray was conducted are simple in nature, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this/these bail a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top