SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1972

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Pooja Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anoop Dhand, Mr. Abhishek Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. S.K. Mahala, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.214/2021 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Sikar for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and later on for the offence under Section 306 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that finding the allegation against her of murdering her husband to be false, charge sheet has been filed under Section 306 IPC. He submitted that the material on record in the shape of statements of the prosecution witnesses and transcript of the so called mobile conversation reveals trivial matrimonial dispute between the parties and there is complete absence of element of abatement to the extent it could compel the deceased to commit suicide. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since23.04.2021, charge sheet has been filed, she has no criminal antecedents, trial of the case will take time, she has minor children and prayed for her release on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of all

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top