SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1829

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tarun Kumar Mishra, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Learned Public Prosecutor apprises this Court that compliance of Section 15A(3) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') has been made.

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.0155/2021 registered at Police Station Devli, District Tonk for the offence under Section(s) 366, 379 & 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Act of 1989 and later on for the offence under Section(s) 366, 379 & 376(2)(N) IPC and under Section(s) 3(1)(W)(i)(ii) & 3(2)(V) of the Act of 1989.

Learned counsel for the appellant contends that he has falsely been implicated in this case wherein the prosecutrix is a major married lady of 29 years of age with 5 children. Drawing attention of this Court towards her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., learned counsel submitted that she has gone with the appellant on her own volition, has travelled at number of places through public transport, has stayed with him in rented premises for more than two months without raising any alarm. Learned counsel submitted th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top