SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2204

CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Jitendra Choudhari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Imran Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Chandra Kumar Songara, J. - This application for suspension of sentence has been preferred on behalf of the applicant/appellant under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentence awarded by Additional Sessions Judge No. 8, Jaipur Metropolitan Second, vide its judgment dated 24.09.2021 in Sessions Case No.03/2020 (36/2019) (CIS No. 414/2019).

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant submits that the applicant/appellant was on bail during trial and his sentence has already been granted by the learned trial court after judgment and order of conviction. Hence, sentence awarded to the applicant/appellant may be suspended during pendency of the appeal.

3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the applicant/appellant and overall facts and circumstances of the case; but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top