RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Farjand Ali, J.
Chetan Kumar Sethi - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through The PP - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 264 of 2023
Decided On : 01-03-2023
SUSPENSION - APPEAL - The court allowed the suspension of the appellant's sentence under Section 389 CrPC, considering the appellant's age, the likelihood of delayed appeal hearing, and the conditions for bail, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the appellant's appearance during the appeal process.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, Smt Chetan Kumar Sethi, appealed against a conviction and sentence from the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act. She sought suspension of her sentence during the appeal process.
Finding of the Court:
The court found merit in suspending the sentence based on the appellant's age (62 years) and the anticipated delay in the appeal hearing. The court deemed it appropriate to allow the suspension until the final disposal of the appeal.
Issues: Whether the sentence awarded to the appellant should be suspended during the pendency of the appeal, considering her age and the timeline for the appeal hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied Section 389 CrPC, which allows for the suspension of sentences pending appeal, and determined that the appellant's circumstances warranted such suspension to ensure her rights were protected while awaiting the appeal outcome.
Result: The court allowed the application for suspension of the sentence, releasing the appellant on bail under specified conditions until the appeal is resolved.
ORDER
1. The appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC being aggrieved of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.02.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Bhilwara in Sessions Case No.85/2015. He has also preferred an application No.185/2023 under Section 389 CrPC seeking suspension of Sentence.
2. The sentence awarded to the appellant has already been suspended by learned trial Court till 14.03.2023 by taking report of Section 389 Sub clause 3 of the Cr.P.C. Upon consideration the grounds raised in the memo of the appeal and after going through the judgment impugned and looking to the age of the appellant being 62 years and as hearing of the appeal is unlikely in near future, I deem it proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the appellant during the pendency of the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentences filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Curruption Act Cases, Bhilwara vide judgment dated 13.02.2023 in Sessions Case No.85/2015 against the appellant-applicant Smt Chetan Kumar Sethi S/o Tejmal Sethi shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and she shall be released on bail, provided she executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance in this court on 05.04.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, she will give in writing her changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
4. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court established that under Section 389 CrPC, a sentence can be suspended during the appeal process if the circumstances justify such action, particularly considering the age of the appellant an....
The court established that under Section 389 of Cr.P.C., a sentence can be suspended during the appeal process if justified by the circumstances of the case.
Under Section 389 of Cr.P.C., a sentence can be suspended during the appeal process, contingent upon the provision of a personal bond and sureties.
The court has the discretion to suspend substantive sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. based on the arguments and facts of the case.
Suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is warranted when appellants were on bail during trial and appeal hearing is not imminent.
The court may suspend a sentence if the accused are on bail and the appeal process is expected to take a significant amount of time.
The court ruled that the duration of custody and the nature of injuries justified the suspension of the appellant's sentence pending appeal.
Under Section 389 of Cr.P.C., a sentence can be suspended during the appeal process, contingent upon the provision of a personal bond and sureties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.