SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1273

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nishant Motsara
For the Respondent: Aneesh Bhurat

ORDER :

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.

3. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No. 1584/2023.

4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and the appellants were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellants.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, (NDPS Cases) (Additional Session Judge No. 1), Nohar, District Hanumangarh vide judgment dated 02.12.2023 in Sessions Case No. 06/2017 (CIS No. 484/2015) against the appellants-applicants (1) Vijay Kumar S/o Prathiviram and (2) Gaura @ Gurpayas S/o Sukhdev Singh, shall be suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal subject to the condition that the appellants shall deposit the 50% of the fine amou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top