RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Arun Bhansali, J.
Aashish Kumar & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7352/2021 and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7079/2021
Decided On : 14-12-2021
Recruitment - Constable Recruitment-2019 - Rajasthan Police Subordinate Services Rules, 1989 - The court interpreted Rule 14 regarding physical fitness standards, emphasizing the eligibility of candidates from tribal areas despite subsequent amendments, leading to the decision to quash the rejection of the petitioners' candidatures.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners applied for Constable General (TSP) positions but were not appointed due to height requirements. They argued that the height requirement for tribal candidates was misapplied, as they met the minimum height of 160 Cms.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners were eligible under the original provisions of Rule 14, which allowed for a minimum height of 160 Cms for tribal candidates, and that the subsequent amendment could not be applied retrospectively.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were eligible for appointment despite the amendment to Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Services Rules, 1989, which altered height requirements.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendment to Rule 14 could not be applied retrospectively to disqualify candidates who were eligible under the original rule at the time of their application.
Result: The writ petitions were allowed, and the rejection of the petitioners' candidatures was quashed.
ORDER
1. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners aggrieved against the non-consideration of their candidature by the respondents pursuant to the Constable Recruitment-2019.
2. The respondents initiated the recruitment process by notification dated 04.12.2019 for the post of Constable General. The petitioners applied for the post of Constable General (TSP). After passing the written examination and undergoing physical efficiency test, the petitioners were expecting appointment, however, when they were not accorded appointment, petitioners sought information regarding the reason for their non-appointment.
3. The petitioners were informed that as their height was less than the minimum required height i.e. 168 Cms. and though they were passed in physical efficiency test by according relaxation to them, as candidates having the requisite height i.e. 168 cms. were available, they were accorded appointment, though the selected candidates were lower in merit than the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners made submissions with reference to provisions of Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Services Rules, 1989 ('Rules of 1989'), which deals with the physical fitness indicating that the minimum height of the candidates belonging to tribal area is required to be not less than 160 Cms. and as the petitioners have height 160 Cms. / more than 160 cms., they were eligible.
5. Further submissions were made that the action of the respondents in excluding the petitioners based on the fact that candidates belonging to tribal area having requisite height of 168 Cms. were available, is incorrect, inasmuch as, the said provision in the Rule is not applicable for tribal areas, as the same is confined to SC/ST candidates and, therefore, the action of the respondents in not according appointment to the petitioners on the said ground is not justified.
6. It was prayed that the respondents be directed to indicate the petitioners' marks and in case they have obtained marks more than the cut-off meant for their category, they may be accorded appointment.
7. Learned counsel also pointed out that interim orders have been granted requiring the respondents to keep one post vacant in each of the petitions.
8. Learned AAG made submissions that the reliance placed by the petitioners on the proviso (i) to Rule 14 (2) of the Rules of 1989 is misplaced, inasmuch as, by notification dated 02.03.2020, the Rule 14 has been amended, whereby, the existing proviso (i) of Sub Rule 2 of Rule 14 has been deleted.
9. Further submissions were made that in the advertisement dated 04.12.2019, there was a specific stipulation that the amendments, if any, which takes place during the course of the recruitment, would be applicable and as such, the petitioners in view of the amendment made in proviso to Rule 14 (2) of the Rules being ineligible, the petitions deserve to be dismissed.
10. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and have perused the material available on record.
11. The facts as noticed, hereinbefore, are not in dispute, wherein, the petitioners belong to TSP area and have filled up their forms for the post of Constable General (TSP).
12. As per the result of the candidates produced by learned AAG under the directions of the Court, all the petitioners have obtained marks higher than the cut-off meant for their category i.e. TSP/Gen. or TSP/ST in their respective districts i.e. Sirohi, Udaipur or Pratapgarh. Further all the candidates have height 160 Cms. / more than 160 Cms. but less than 168 cms.
13. The provisions of Rule 14 of the Rules of 1989, which deals with physical fitness of the candidates under Sub Rule 2 deals with the required height of the candidates, the same alongwith the relevant proviso reads as under:-
"(2) Except in the case of women candidates, no candidate, who is less than 168 Cms. in height and whose deflated chest measurement is less than 81 Cms. and inflated less than 86 Cms. with a mi

AI
Candidates from tribal areas are eligible for recruitment under the original height requirements, and amendments cannot be applied retrospectively to disqualify them.
Eligibility for appointment is strictly governed by the criteria set in the recruitment advertisement and relevant rules, preventing any claim for relaxation post-appointment without stipulated guide....
Candidates participating in a recruitment process cannot challenge its conditions after disqualification; strict adherence to advertised criteria is mandated by constitutional principles of equality.
Height measurements for recruitment must adhere to rounding rules, preventing disqualification based on minor discrepancies and ensuring fair evaluation of candidates.
Height measurement rules must be applied during the Physical Standard Test, allowing rounding up to prevent arbitrary disqualification and ensuring candidates' eligibility for further recruitment sta....
Candidates must benefit from height rounding rules during Physical Standard Tests to ensure fair opportunity for advancement in recruitment processes.
Congenital abnormalities like nevi are not grounds for disqualification unless they impede duty performance; height relaxations for North-East candidates do not constitute unfair advantages.
Height requirements for promotions must be consistent and not arbitrary, ensuring equal opportunity for candidates from different regions.
The recruitment process for constables must adhere to the stipulated conditions in the advertisement, ensuring fairness and transparency in candidate selection.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.