SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 109

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Indrajit Mahanty, CJ.
Shambhu Debnath - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 718/2020
Decided On : 02-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Ms. R Purkayastha, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Bidyut Majumder, Asstt. S.G, for the Respondent

Congenital abnormalities like nevi are not grounds for disqualification unless they impede duty performance; height relaxations for North-East candidates do not constitute unfair advantages.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Process - Medical Examination Guidelines - Birthmark/Nevus - Candidates for the post of Constable (GD) in CAPFs - Petitioner was declared unfit due to a nevus; Court held that congenital anomalies only qualify for disqualification if they impede duty performance - Fresh Review Medical Examination Board constituted as prior assessment was non-definitive (Paras 2-6, 10-14).

(B) Recruitment Standards for North-Eastern Candidates - Height relaxation provisions for North-Eastern candidates not interpreted as unfair advantage; recognized as necessary due to regional physical differences (Paras 7-9, 12-13).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner qualified several stages of the recruitment but was declared medically unfit due to a nevus. Subsequent medical evaluations deemed him fit.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the formation of a new Review Medical Examination Board and clarified the interpretation of height requirements for North-Eastern candidates.

Issues: The primary issues addressed whether the nevus constituted a legitimate reason for disqualification and the interpretation of recruitment provisions for height standards.

Ratio Decidendi: A congenital condition does not justify disqualification unless it hinders performance; region-specific height standards are not a relaxation but a necessary policy adjustment.

Result: Writ petition allowed; the petitioner to be appointed on the reserved post immediately.

Table of Content
1. petitioner declared unfit due to nevus. (Para 2)
2. respondents agreed to reserve a post for petitioner. (Para 3 , 4)
3. consideration of various categories and physical standards. (Para 6 , 7 , 14)
4. comparison of petitioner's case with relevant legal precedents. (Para 9 , 10 , 12)
5. court emphasized merit-based consideration over relaxed standards. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

2. This writ petition has come to be filed by the petitioner, namely Sri Shambhu Debnath who appeared in the selection process pursuant to one advertisement dated 21st July 2018 issued by the Staff Selection Commission for recruitment to the post of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), NIA, SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles (AR). The recruitment process adopted consists of a Computer Based Examination, Physical Efficiency Test, Physical Standard Test and Medical Examination. The petitioner, admittedly, was declared qualified in the Computer Based Examination, Physical Efficiency Test and Physical Standard Test. It is further stated that on 24th January 2020, the petitioner appeared for Detailed Medical Examination (DME) and after going through the test, he has been declared unfit/unqualified inter alia on the ground that the petitioner had a huge 'naevus' on right side of his abdomen. Although the petitioner claimed that the said nevus was a birthmark and it is also alleged that the guidelines do not anywhere prescribe rejection in the event a candidate is found with nevus. Yet since the petitioner was declared unfit/unqualified he filed the present writ petition.

3. A counter-affidavit came to be filed by the respondents and it may be pertinent to note herein that this Court vide order dated 20th October 2020 directed the respondents to include the petitioner in the final select list provisionally subject to further orders that may be passed in this petition and through affidavit dated 12th April 2021, it is admitted by the respondents that pursuant to said direction one post has been kept reserved awaiting outcome of the present writ petition.

4. Further, in course of hearing of the matter, this Court passed the following order on 18th November 2021 :

'18/11/2021

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The main issue that arises for consideration at the present juncture in the case is relating to Annexure-I which is a report submitted by the Review Medical Board in respect of examination of the petitioner Shambhu Debnath. The said report appears to have been prepared by a Board of doctors of the Conduct of RME of Combined Rect Rally for Constable GD in CAPFs and Rfn (GD) in AR 2018 which is extracted hereinbelow :

'FORM NO.4 OF CONSTABLE (GD) EXAM-2018

REVIEW MEDICAL EXAMINATION REPORT

Roll No. : 5601003543

Name of Candidate : SHAMBHU DEBNATH

Gender : Male

Father's/Husband Name : MANTU DEBNATH

Identification Marks:

(i) A BLACK MOLE ON BACK OF NECK

(ii) A BLACK MOLE ON GLABELLA

Candidate's Signature (in presence of the Medical Board)

Sd/- (Shambhu Debnath)

(1) Reason for Medical Unfitness : Huge Nevus on Rt. Side of abdomen.

(2) Brief of Review Medical Examination & Finding thereof :

Huge Becker's Nevus on Rt. Lower trunk (both front & back)

(3) Final Opinion:

(a) FIT : ...................

(b) UNFIT on account of: Huge Nevus which may have underlying Congenital anomalies & may further turn into tumor.'

The report speaks for itself. The learned Asstt. Solicitor General on behalf of the Union of India drew the attention of this Court to Office Memorandum dated 20.05.2015 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs and in particular, Chapter-XII under the heading 'Examination for Skin Diseases and Leprosy' and (B) stipulates other conditions which are to be considered for rejection. Sl. No.8 thereof reads as follows:

'8. Congenital or acquired anomalies of the skin such as nevi or vascular tumors that interfere with function, or are exposed to constant irritation are disqualifying. History of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top