SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2028

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Pankaj Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bhawani Singh Mertia, for the Appellant; Mr. Arun Kumar, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following relief:

    'It is therefore, humbly prayed that the Misc. Petition may kindly be allowed and in the interest of justice, the substantive sentence mentioned in schedule as awarded to the accused petitioner deserves to be ordered run concurrently'.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties fairly concede that the present case is squarely covered by the decision rendered in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2883/2014 Rajender Kabra Vs. State of Rajasthan decided on 17.02.2017. The relevant portion of the judgment in Rajender Kabra (supra) reads as under:

    'This second criminal misc. petition under section 482 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner with a prayer that the sentences awarded to him in 32 different cases for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,details of which are being provided in later part of this order, may be ordered to run concurrently.

The earlier S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No.113/2013 preferred by the petitioner before this Court was disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 16.05.2013. The order dated 16.05.2013 is re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top