Back
UMA SHANKER VYAS
Guddu – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Learned Public Prosecutor has apprised this Court that compliance of Section 15-A (3) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') has been made in present cases.
2. These criminal appeals under Section 14-A (2) of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been filed in connection with FIR No.97/2023 registered at Police Station Mania, District Dholpur for the offence under Section(s) 143, 323, 341, 504, 506 & 325 of IPC and under Section(s) 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for appellants that appellants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that accused-appellants have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence pray for their release on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these appeals.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge appellants on bail.
6. The orders d
The court established that prolonged judicial custody and the right to a fair trial are significant factors in granting bail under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)....
The court established that prolonged judicial custody without trial can warrant the granting of bail, emphasizing the importance of a fair trial and adherence to legal procedures under the Scheduled ....
The court's decision was based on the nature of the allegations, the material in the case diary, and the filing of a complaint under Sections 107 & 151 Cr.P.C. for the same incident, without expressi....
The court established that compliance with procedural requirements and the nature of allegations are critical factors in determining bail under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of ....
The court granted bail to accused-appellants under the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, emphasizing the need for timely justice without commenting on the merits....
The court established that in bail considerations, the voluntary actions of the prosecutrix and the absence of criminal antecedents of the accused are significant factors that can influence the decis....
The court established that the provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act must be balanced with the rights of the accused, particularly in cases where the allegations are not severe and t....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the considerations of the nature of the allegation, length of custody, filing of charge sheet, and the absence of criminal antecedents, without ex....
Bail can be granted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act when the accused demonstrate no prior criminal record, have been in custody for a considerable time, and the charge sheet has been f....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the consideration of the nature of allegations, length of custody, and the material contained in the case diary.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
