Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
Aleykutty Varkey – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Tribunal Under The Maintenance And Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for maintenance and the tribunal's orders. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. responses and appearances regarding the case. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments regarding appeal maintainability under the act. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's jurisdiction regarding appeals by children. (Para 9) |
| 5. final order regarding the tribunal's jurisdiction. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J.
1. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers;
“i) call for the records leading to the issuance of the original of Exhibit P-3 and set aside it by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction;
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to ensure strict implementation of the directions in Exhibit P-1;”
2. The petitioner, a nonagenarian, had filed a petition before the second respondent-Maintenance Tribunal, claiming maintenance from her two sons and a daughter, who are respondents 3 to 5 herein. However, no amount was claimed against the younger daughter, Smt.Sherly Felix, as she is taking care of the petitioner. The Tribunal, after considering the petition filed by the petitioner, passed Ext.P1 or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
