IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.
Dr. Mahesh Kumar Panwar, S/o. Shri Dudha Ram Panwar - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Services and Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10490 Of 2024
Decided On : 09-09-2024
Transfer - Awaiting Posting Order - Rajasthan Medical and Health Service Rules, 1963; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - The court emphasized that awaiting posting orders must comply with existing bans and require proper justification and permissions, particularly during a ban period.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Medical Officer promoted to Principal Specialist, challenged an awaiting posting order and relieving order issued during a government-imposed transfer ban, claiming it violated established rules and was intended to accommodate another employee.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the awaiting posting order was issued in violation of the transfer ban and lacked necessary justification or permission from the Chief Minister's office, rendering it invalid.
Issues: Whether the awaiting posting order was valid given the existing transfer ban and the lack of required permissions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that awaiting posting orders cannot be issued casually or without adherence to established rules, especially during a ban, and must demonstrate administrative exigency.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, quashing the awaiting posting order and relieving order.
JUDGMENT :
(Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.) :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being heard and decided finally at this stage.
3. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the awaiting posting order dated 24.06.2024 (Annex.5) and relieving order dated 25.06.2024.
4. Briefly noted the facts of the present case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Medical Officer on 11.06.1996 by regular process of selection as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Medical and Health Service Rules, 1963 (for short ‘the Rules of 1963’). Thereafter, vide order dated 12/16.07.2018, he was promoted on the post of Principal Specialist (Orthopedics) as per the Rules of 1963. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner joined as Principal Medical Officer, Nagaur on 18.08.2021. While the petitioner was working as Principal Medical Officer at Nagaur, he was kept under ‘Awaiting Posting Order’ vide order dated 24.06.2024 (Annex.5) and his Headquarter was changed from Nagaur to Directorate (Public Health), Jaipur. The petitioner was relieved from the post of Principal Medical Officer, District Hospital, Nagaur vide order dated 25.06.2024. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently and fervently submits that the awaiting posting order passed by the respondents on 24.06.2024 is in violation of the Ban imposed by the State Government vide order dated 04.01.2023. He submits that no transfer/awaiting posting order could have been passed by the respondents during the period of ban without taking permission from the office of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Rajasthan. He submits that even the awaiting posting order is in violation of the decisions of the State Government under Rule 25-A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that the awaiting posting order passed in the case of the petitioner is only with the purpose to adjust and accommodate one Sunita Singh at Nagaur.
6. To buttress his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments of this Court rendered in case of Hemendra Kumar Trivedi vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6261/2017), decided on 13.03.2018 and in case of Satish Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4564/2020), decided on 18.08.2023. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition may be allowed and the awaiting posting order dated 24.06.2024 (Annex.5) and consequential relieving order dated 25.06.2024 (Annex.6) may be quashed and set aside.
7. Per contra, Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent State assisted by Ms. Anita Rajpurohit submits that it is well within the domain of the State Government to utilize the services of a government employee at a particular place in the larger public interest and, therefore, in the administrative exigency, awaiting posting order passed in the case of the petitioner is perfectly justified. Learned counsel submits that it is for the respondents-State to see that the services of a particular person can be best utilized at a particular place and, therefore, the transfer order/awaiting posting order is passed in the larger public interest.
8. Learned counsel further submits that in the present case, awaiting posting order has been passed in consonance with the decision No.5 of the Government of Rajasthan’s Decision under Rule 25-A of the Rules of 1951.
9. Learned counsel for the State very fairly submitted that the awaiting posting order stands almost on identical footing to the order of transfer and the application of the period of ban is equally applicable for the transfers/awaiting posting order to be passed by the State Government. He also submitted that in the present case, the permission of the Hon’ble Chief Minister’s Office was not obtained before passing the awaiting posting order in the case of the pe
Awaiting posting orders must comply with transfer bans and require proper justification and permissions to be valid.
The awaiting posting order cannot be issued without urgency and proper permissions, violating established rules.
Transfer without specific assignment contravenes defined statutory procedures, establishing an Awaiting Posting Order lacking necessary compliance.
Awaiting Posting Orders (APO) cannot be used as punitive measures or substitutes for disciplinary action; explicit reasons must be provided for such administrative decisions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the transfer policy and statutory provisions in making transfer decisions, and the binding nature of policies framed by....
Indefinitely placing a public servant under Awaiting Posting Orders without statutory basis violates service law principles and fairness in governance.
Administrative decisions affecting service positions must adhere strictly to the principles of natural justice, comply with existing judicial orders, and be founded on lawful premises.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.