Back
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Ranjeet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J.:— The instant misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed by the petitioner-complainant Ranjeet Kumar for assailing the order dated 25.08.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Kota rejecting the criminal revision (No. 01/2021) preferred by him and affirming the order dated 09.03.2021 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, No. 7, Kota in regular CIS No. 1653/2017 (FR No. 159/2017) whereby the learned trial court while accepting the FR filed by the investigating agency, rejected the protest petition filed by the petitioner - complainant.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-complainant submitted a complaint in the court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 7, Kota inter alia alleging that his marriage with the respondent No. 2 Pinky Mahawar was solemnized in the year 2011. However, she has been residing with her parents since 2013 and she has lodged several false and frivolous cases against him. It was alleged in the complaint that the accused/respondent No. 2 has been receiving pension under the scheme of Rajasthan State Government from Social Justice and Empowerment Depa
- Expression ‘cruelty’ in Section 498A covers conduct which may drive women to commit suicide or cause grave injury (mental or physical) or danger to life or harassment with a view to coerce her to m....
A complaint dismissed before registration does not bar a subsequent complaint on the same facts, provided it is not dismissed on merit.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the scope of challenging two concurrent findings under Section 482 of the CrPC is limited, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illeg....
The court affirmed that sufficient prima facie evidence can justify the framing of charges under IPC provisions related to fraud and misrepresentation.
The court emphasized the importance of considering malafide complaints and the principle of quashing FIR in cases of malafide intention.
The court upheld the final report by police stating no case was made out against the respondents, emphasizing the necessity of thorough investigation and detailed reasoning in judicial decisions.
The main legal point established is that revision lies against the order of conviction affirmed in appeal, and settlement of dispute by way of compromise does not warrant the exercise of inherent jur....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
