SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1095

DINESH MEHTA, RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Rajendra Singh @ Golu – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : D.S. Thind, Amit Kumar
For the Respondent: B.R. Bishnoi

ORDER :

1. This application for suspension of sentence has been filed by the appellant, who has been convicted by the trial Court for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n) & 376-D of IPC and has been awarded sentence as under:

Offence

Sentence

Fine

376(2)(n) IPC

10 years' R.I.

Rs.30,000/- in default of payment to 2 years' R.I.

376-D IPC

L.I. until death

Rs.50,000/- in default of payment to 3 years' R.I.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the story projected by the victim does not appear to be reliable and appeal to prudence. Inviting Court's attention towards the backdrop facts, learned counsel highlighted that as per the testimony of victim, immediately after the sexual assault by the appellant and his friends, her uncle (Tau) had come on the terrace; whereafter he fell down or he was pushed down and it was after the uncle fell down, she was taken to a third place and gang raped, is totally false and unbelievable.

3. He submitted that after investigation the police did not find any offence under Section 302 made out against the present appellant or against any of the co-accused persons and even her allegation t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top