SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2312

NUPUR BHATI
Ram Sukh – Appellant
Versus
Sohni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. V.D. Gaur.
For the Respondent: Mr. R.K. Karwasra and Mr. Dhanpat Chowdhary.

ORDER :

(Nupur Bhati, J.)

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner claiming for following reliefs:-

    "a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned order dated 11.08.2021 (Annexure-8) passed by learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Jayal in Civil Suit No.06/2014 may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent of rejecting the application.

    b) The application (Annexure-6) filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed.

    c) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court considers just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a bare perusal of Section 39 of Rajasthan Stamps Act, 1998 shows that no document can be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties to receive evidence unless such instrument/document is duly stamped however, there is a proviso to the Section 39 where certain exemptions have been laid down. He also submits that if the exemptions so provided in the Section 39 have been complied with then the patta in question could have been admitted in evidence and that the exemp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top