SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2078

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Rohit Ralhan – Appellant
Versus
Madhuri Bhatia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Dr. Mohit Singhvi
For the Respondent: Mrs. Harveer Sidhu

Table of Content
1. aggrieved parties seek divorce by consent. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. parties argue for waiver of statutory period. (Para 2 , 5 , 7 , 8)
3. supreme court's guiding principles for waiver. (Para 9 , 10)
4. conditions for waiver fulfilled in this case. (Para 11 , 12)
5. writ petition allowed; order set aside. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

ORDER :

(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)

This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 06.05.2023 passed by the Family Court No.1, Jodhpur (for short 'the Court below') in Suit No.298/2023, whereby the joint application filed by the petitioner and the respondent (hereinafter "parties") for waiver of six months period prescribed under Section 13-B(2) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (for short 'the Act of 1955') has been dismissed.

2. Mrs. Harveer Sidhu, learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that the respondent is also aggrieved with the order impugned and this writ petition has been filed with the consent of the respondent. Learned counsel submitted that he she no objection if the relief prayed for in this writ petition is granted.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the parties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top