Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Om Prakash Lakhyani Trustee – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the parties on stay application No.7072/2023.
2. By filing the stay application, the applicants/petitioners have claimed the following reliefs:-
Any other appropriate relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner."
3. As the averments made in the stay application would reveal, the applicants/
The judgment emphasizes the inherent nature of the right to privacy as a common law right and its relationship with the Constitution of India. It highlights the balance between the right to privacy a....
The judgment established the importance of an existing work for claiming copyright, the limitations on assignment of copyright, and the conditions for commercial exploitation of privacy rights under ....
The court confirmed that copyright protection extends to expression forms, not ideas, and prima facie establishment of similarity warrants injunction relief.
Interim injunctions must consider the prima facie case and balance of convenience, especially where prior rights and public airing exist.
The judgment emphasizes the creative freedom of filmmakers in addressing social issues and the responsibility to depict the overall message of the film in determining its permissibility. It also high....
Public perception cannot be a ground for staying the release of a docuseries, and judges decide cases based on evidence, not public perception.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article