Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Om Prakash Lakhyani Trustee – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
(Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the parties on stay application No.7072/2023.
2. By filing the stay application, the applicants/petitioners have claimed the following reliefs:-
Any other appropriate relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner."
3. As the averments made in the stay application would reveal, the applicants/petitioners seeking a direction by this Court in the nature of ban/restraint on release of a Film/Movie, namely, "Sirf EK Banda Kaafi Hai" (in short, 'movie in question produced and directed by the respondents no.7 & 8; the Movie in question
The judgment emphasizes the inherent nature of the right to privacy as a common law right and its relationship with the Constitution of India. It highlights the balance between the right to privacy a....
A perusal of the contents of the dialogues in the above noted scenes would show that the offences under Sections 505(1)(b) I.P.C. and 505(2) I.P.C. are fully made out. On the one hand, the sentiments....
Delay in approaching the court, awareness of the film release, and financial repercussions were crucial in the court's decision to reject the injunction.
The importance of exhausting statutory remedies and the powers of the Central Government under the Cinematograph Act, 1952 to suspend the exhibition of any film.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
