IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Suri, J.
Thind Motion Films Private Limited (M/s) – Appellant
Versus
Ishdeep Randhawa & Ors. – Respondents
CR No. 2780 of 2023
Decided On : 04-05-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership rights and conflicts over film production. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal claims regarding copyright and agreements. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 3. jurisdictional arguments regarding the proper court for copyright issues. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. consideration of statutory provisions and their implications. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. guiding principles for high court jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. limitations on interference by high court on lower court operations. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. conclusion on the exercise of article 227 jurisdiction and next steps. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
Judgment
Mr. Vikas Suri, J.
This is a petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01.05.2023 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana whereby ex-parte ad-interim injunction has been passed against the defendants therein from releasing the film “Jodi Teri Meri” on 05.05.2023 i.e. tomorrow.
2. The facts in brief are that father of the plaintiffs viz. Gurdev Singh Randhawa, was director of Gurdev films, which is producer of TV serials, documentaries, tele-films, films, motion pictures and AD films. He had decided to make motion film on the biography of ‘Amar Singh Chamkila and Bibi Amarjot Kaur.’ He had entered into an agreement with the widow of Amar Singh Chamkila and the writing in that regard was executed on 12.10.2012 whereby she had granted permission on behalf of her family to make the film and assured full cooperation. In consideration thereof, she had received a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- and transferred all rights to Gurdev Singh. It was stipulated that the agreement will be binding on the heirs as well. Gurdev Singh Randhawa died on 03.11.2022 and is survived by his widow Smt. Jaspreet Kaur and the plaintiffs namely Ishdeep Randhawa and Sanjot Randhawa.
3. It is further pleaded that the plaintiffs came to know that Gurmail Kaur are making/preparing the film on biography of Amar Singh Chamkila and Bibi Amarjot Kaur in association with M/s Reliance Entertainment, Imitiaz Ali, Diljit Dosanj and Parineeti Chopra. The plaintiffs earlier filed one civil suit titled Ishdeep Randhawa and another vs. Gurmail Kaur and others , against the aforesaid persons, which is pending in the Court of Harsimranjit Singh, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana. It is pleaded that in the said case, Gurmail Kaur and M/s Reliance Entertainment have appeared and filed written statement. During pendency of the said civil suit, the plaintiffs came to know from online and other sources that another film namely ‘Jodi Teri Meri’ is also being prepared and is scheduled for release on 05.05.2023.
4. In the aforesaid backdrop, the plaintiff-respondent Nos.1 and 2 instituted the present suit against the defendant-respondent Nos.3 to 6 as well as the petitioner, by wrongly mentioning the petitioner as Daljit Motion Films (defendant No.2). It was averred therein that they have no right to make/prepare the said film during the subsistence of the agreement between the plaintiffs and Gurmail Kaur (defendant No.3). It is also averred that the afore-noticed film is based and influenced by the book ‘Awaz Mardi Nahi’ authored by Sh. Gulzar Singh Shonki. It is further averred that the concept is also copied and inspired from the aforesaid book and the main actor/hero in both the films is defendant - Diljit Dosanj.
5. The suit was instituted on 01.05.2023 along with the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for grant of ad-interim injunction. On the same day, an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted whereby the defendants were restrained from releasing the film ‘Jodi Teri Meri’ on 05.05.2023, except in due course of law till the next date of hearing i.e. 08.05.2023. It is notable that formal notice of the suit or the application for ad-interim injunction has not been ordered to be issued by the impugned order but it was made clear that if service of defendants is not affected by 08.05.2023 through RC/AD etc. then th
Jai Singh and another vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and another
M/s Astral Traders vs. M/s Haji Mohammad Shaban Dar and others
Sandhana Lodh vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. And another
Point of Law : Power of superintendence of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is well-settled in a host of judicial pronouncements.
Interim injunctions must consider the prima facie case and balance of convenience, especially where prior rights and public airing exist.
The judgment established the importance of an existing work for claiming copyright, the limitations on assignment of copyright, and the conditions for commercial exploitation of privacy rights under ....
The court confirmed that copyright protection extends to expression forms, not ideas, and prima facie establishment of similarity warrants injunction relief.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Petitioner had available statutory remedies under CPC for seeking vacation of the ad-interim orders dated 17.08.2023 and 18.08.2023, and t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.