IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Farjand Ali, J.
Sharvan - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 9941 of 2022
Decided On : 31-07-2023
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8 /18, 8/25 and 8/29 of NDPS Act in connection with FIR No. 01/2020 registered at Police Station Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Office of Deputy Commissioner Narcotics, Kota.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN), Shri T.P. Sharma and perused the order impugned and the other material available on record, particularly, the allegations levelled in the supplementary complaint dated 06.06.2022.
4. It is revealing that the team of CBN on 23.01.2020 intercepted a vehicle truck bearing registration No.RJ-19-GB2942. Upon search being made, it is alleged that a total of 18 Kilogram of opium was recovered from a secret chamber made in the body of truck. As per the allegations, the truck was being driven by one Prem Prakash S/o Bhiya Ram Bishnoi and the conductor was Bhupendra Singh @ Jalam Singh. A case under Section 8 /18(B) of the NDPS Act got registered and both the accused Prem Prakash and Bhupendra Singh were arrested. It is stated that during the course of the investigation, the aforementioned accused disclosed the name of one Rakesh S/o Kalu Ram Jat being the person, who facilitated the crime. On 14.06.2020, the said Rakesh S/o Kalu Ram Jat was apprehended and was thoroughly interrogated. It is further stated that during the course of the investigation, the aforementioned accused Rakesh had disclosed the fact to the Investigating Agency that the recovered contraband was procured to him by some persons, in which, one of the names was of the present petitioner Shrawan Pandit. On the basis of the information supplied and the statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, the present applicant was arraigned as an accused and subsequently thereby got arrested. The investigation is further revealing that the petitioner was already in custody in one other case in Sikar Jail (Raj.) wherefrom he was brought through a production warrant. As a matter of fact, he is behind the bars since 02.12.2021. The investigation with regard to the present petitioner is completed but still the charges have not been framed. Vide order dated 03.03.2023, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted bail to the accused Rakesh in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No.11790/2022. The relevant portion is reproduced herein below:
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the third bail application.
5. No one has put in appearance on behalf of NCB- respondent No.2.
6. I have considered the contentions.
7. Taking note of the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than three years and still charges have not been framed, also taking note of the fact that there is no recovery of any contraband from the petitioner and co-accused Jai Ram has been arrested, also taking note of the fact that in the other case that was registered against the petitioner, he has been granted bail and in that case also while granting bail
The court emphasized that personal liberty must be prioritized over statutory restrictions in granting bail, especially when there are violations of mandatory provisions.
The court established that the right to a speedy trial and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution can override the statutory restrictions on bail under the NDPS Act, particularly when ....
The court established that procedural non-compliance in drug seizure cases can justify bail, prioritizing individual liberty over statutory restrictions.
The judgment establishes that procedural compliance in narcotics cases is crucial, and failure to adhere to statutory requirements can lead to the granting of bail, even in serious offenses under the....
The court prioritized the fundamental right to a speedy trial over statutory restrictions on bail under the NDPS Act, allowing bail due to prolonged incarceration and procedural non-compliance.
Bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act requires clear evidence of innocence and no likelihood of reoffending, especially for serious crimes.
The court established that fundamental rights can take precedence over statutory restrictions on bail in cases of procedural non-compliance.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.