Back
FARJAND ALI
Trilok Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of procedural history and trial outcome. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on appeal and bail bond forfeiture. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's considerations on procedural efficiency. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's analysis on petitioner's health and compliance. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. decision on revising prior court order. (Para 8) |
| 6. disposition of the case and pending applications. (Para 9) |
ORDER :
Farjand Ali, J.
By way of filing the instant criminal revision petition, challenge has been made to the order dated 01.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2 Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellate Court) in Criminal Appeal No.217/2021 whereby the bail bonds of the petitioner were forfeited and a warrant of arrest was issued. At the same time, the learned appellate Court had directed to send the matter back to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Anoopgarh for compliance of the order of sentence dated 28.05.2019 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Anoopgarh (herein after referred to as 'the trial Court') in Criminal Case No. 374/2016 (1318/2016).
2. Briefly stated that facts which are necessary for disposal of the instant criminal revi
Satisfactory explanations for non-appearance can lead to a reduction in forfeited bail amounts under Cr.P.C.
The court has the discretion to allow an extension of time to deposit the fine amount in cases of genuine hardship, such as the COVID-19 situation and economic difficulties.
The court established that a delay in filing a criminal revision could be condoned, allowing for conditional bail and compliance with legal obligations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
