SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2109

FARJAND ALI
X – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shambhoo Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Bhati, P.P.

Table of Content
1. juvenile's confinement status (Para 1)
2. arguments for and against bail (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's reasoning on juvenile bail rights (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. final ruling and order on bail (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The juvenile X S/o K has been confined in connection with FIR No.71/2019 registered at Police Station Swaroopganj, Sirohi and is facing charges under Sections 3 /4 of POCSO Act. He is lodged at the Child Observation Home, Sirohi. The bail application preferred under Section 12 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT , 2015 by the juvenile through amicus curiae was dismissed by the learned Principle Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sirohi vide order dated 25.02.2022. An appeal was preferred under Section 101 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT , 2015 against the said order before the learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 & Child Right Protection Commission Act, 2005) Sirohi which also came to be dismissed vide order dated 28.04.2023 and the order passed by the learned Board was upheld. Aggrieved by the aforesaid two orders, the present revision petition has been filed under Section 102 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT read with Section 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top