SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1949

FARJAND ALI
X – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shreekant Verma.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, P.P.

Table of Content
1. details of juvenile's case and history (Para 1)
2. arguments for and against bail application (Para 2 , 3)
3. legal rationale for bail entitlement (Para 4)
4. court's opinion on bail decision (Para 5 , 6)
5. final decision and orders (Para 7)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The juvenile 'X' son of Shri Lalu Ram has been confined in connection with FIR No.85/2023 registered at Police Station Chattargarh, District Bikaner and is facing charges under Sections 457 , 354-A, 354-D of IPC and 7/8 of POCSO Act. He is lodged at the Child Observation Home, Bikaner. The bail application preferred under Section 12 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT , 2015 by the juvenile through amicus curiae was dismissed by the learned Principle Juvenile Justice Board, Bikaner vide order dated 16.06.2023. An appeal was preferred under Section 101 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT , 2015 against the said order before the learned Special Judge POCSO Act 2005 & Child Rights Protetion Commission Act, 2005 Bikaner which also came to be dismissed vide order dated 19.06.2023 and the order passed by the learned Board was up-held. Aggrieved by the aforesaid two orders, the present revision petition has been filed under Sectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top