SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2155

FARJAND ALI
`S` – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhagat Dadhich.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, P.P.

Table of Content
1. juvenile detainment without bail conditions must be justified. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opposition argues against juvenile bail due to crime severity. (Para 3)
3. release must be substantiated with appropriate risks shown. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court grants bail under specific conditions according to law. (Para 8)

ORDER :

Farjand Ali, J.

The juvenile 'S' son of Late Nacharam has been confined in connection with FIR No.124/2023 registered at Police Station Loonkarnsar, District Bikaner and is facing charges under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. He is lodged at the Observation Home, Bikaner. The bail application preferred under Section 12 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT , 2015 by the juvenile through amicus curiae was dismissed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Bikaner vide order dated 19.06.2023. An appeal was preferred under Section 101 of the JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT , 2015 against the said order before the learned Judge, Children Court, Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005, Bikaner which also came to be dismissed vide order dated 16.09.2023 and the order passed by the learned Board was upheld. Aggrieved by the aforesaid two orders, the present revision petition has been fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top