SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1945

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Deeparam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. C. Joshi
For the Respondent: Mr. Rishabh Handa

JUDGMENT :

Madan Gopal Vyas, J.

All the aforesaid Civil Revision Petitions under section 115 of CPC have been filed by the petitioners-defendents against the order dated 23.03.2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Pali in Civil Original Suit Nos.64/2014, 67/2014, 69/2014, 70/2014, 66/2014, 68/2014 & 65/2014.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in the application filed under Order 7, Rule 11 of CPC, there was a specific objection on behalf of the defendents-petitioners that the suit property is an agricultural land and therefore, the civil court does not have jurisdiction to hear and decide the suit, however, the learned trial court without considering this aspect of the matter has rejected the application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners further submits that the controversy involved in the present revision petition is no more res-integra as the co-odinate Bench of this Court in Hastimal & Ors. v. Pushpa Devi & Ors. (S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.84/2017) decided on 20.11.2020, has held that where the suit pertains to an agricultural land, the cognizance of it by any court other than a revenue court is barred unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top