SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2233

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Devkaran – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate. and Mr. Rahul Yaduvanshi

ORDER :

Mr. Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This civil revision petition is filed by the unsuccessful defendant against the order dated 06.02.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Thanagazi (for brevity "the learned trial Court") in Civil Suit No.34/10/2023 whereby, an application filed by him under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed.

2. The relevant facts in brief are that the respondent-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff") filed a suit against the defendant with the averments that a residential Bada as described in Para 1 of the plaint situated in village Guwara Bandipul, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar was under his ownership and possession since the time of his ancestors in which he has raised construction of a residential house. It was alleged that the defendant wants to dispossess him forcibly and interfere with in his use and occupation of the suit premises. Therefore, a decree of permanent injunction was prayed for. The defendant filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC stating therein that the plaintiff has not specified the Khasra number in which the disputed residential Bada was situated and he has filed the suit wrongly reckoning the agricultur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top