SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2301

PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Sheetal Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhavit Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP.

ORDER :

Praveer Bhatnagar, J.

The instant bail applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners - Sheetal and Padam, apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR Nos. 436/2022, 524/2022, 522/2022, 503/2022, 526/2022, 530/2022, 519/2022, 529/2022, 525/2022, 436/2022, 519/2022, 525/2022, 503/2022, 529/2022, 526/2022, 522/2022, 524/2022, 530/2022, 435/2022 and 435/2022 registered at Police Station Pratapnagar, District Bhilwara for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners Sheetal and Padam argued that the petitioners are engaged in trade and business at Delhi and received certain goods from the accused Harsh Garg and Sarvesh alias Vinod. He further argued that the petitioners did not have any direct involvement in the alleged crime in question and they are consumers only and have been falsely implicated in this FIRs lodged by different complainants viz. Kamlesh Gokhru, Naresh Godha, Sushil Sharma, Sandeep Kothari, Suresh Somani, Purshottam Mundra, Sanjay Kumar Jain, Madhu Laddha, Veeraj Kumar Jain and Mahendra Teli at Police Station Pratapnagar, District Bhilwara.

3. Learned counsel further argued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top