Prem Prakash Bidiyasar vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 2156

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Prem Prakash Bidiyasar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: J.S. Choudhary, Pradeep Choudhary
For the Respondents: Mukesh Trivedi, G.R. Punia, Shanti Choudhary

Table of Content
1. application for anticipatory bail regarding false implications. (Para 1)
2. petitioners claim false implication and counter accusations. (Para 2)
3. prosecution argues clear case of fraud against petitioners. (Para 3)
4. prima facie case points to petitioners' involvement in fraud. (Para 4 , 5)
5. legal standards for anticipatory bail and evidence against petitioner. (Para 6 , 7)
6. dismissal of bail application for petitioner no. 1, approval for no. 2. (Para 8)
7. conditions set for anticipatory bail for petitioner no. 2. (Para 9)

ORDER :

1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with CR No. 288/2015, Police Station Ratanada, Jodhpur East for the offences under Sections 420 , 406, 467, 468 471 and 120B IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is argued that the petitioners neither prepared any forged documents nor put any signature of any person for the purpose of cheating. It is submitted that the complainant had misappropriate the money of the company and in this regard, the petitioner no. 1 lodged FIRs against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document