SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
KULDEEP MATHUR, J.
Kulbir Singh Chhabra - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3054 of 2021
Decided on : 08-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Khet Singh Rajpurohit.
For the Respondents: Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP.

Photocopies can be admitted as secondary evidence when the original document is lost, provided they are relevant and material to the case.

Headnote:(A) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 65 - Admissibility of secondary evidence - The court allowed the photocopy of a legal notice to be admitted as secondary evidence despite the original being sent to the opposite party, emphasizing the materiality of the fact. (Paras 8, 10)

(B) Legal Notice - The court recognized that a photocopy can be considered secondary evidence when the original has been sent and cannot be produced, thus upholding the petitioner's right to present it. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act after cheques issued by the respondent were returned due to insufficient funds. The petitioner sought to admit a photocopy of a legal notice as secondary evidence after the original was lost.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the photocopy of the legal notice could be admitted as secondary evidence, as the original had been sent to the respondent.

Issues: The main issue was whether a photocopy could be admitted as secondary evidence in place of the original notice.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a photocopy can be admitted as secondary evidence when the original is lost, provided it is relevant and material to the case.

Result: The petition was allowed, and the order of the lower court was set aside.

ORDER :

Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, J. - By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs-:

"It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed on behalf of petitioner that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and order dated 21.01.2021 passed by learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur in complaint case No.7666/2014; Kulbir Singh Chhabra v. Vinay Dagliya, may kindly be quashed and set aside and consequent thereto, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 65 of the Evidence Act may kindly be accepted. Any other appropriate order or direction which may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may be passed in favour of the petitioner."

2. Succinctly stated, facts of the present case are that the respondent No.2 had issued two cheques having No.000051 and No.000052 for the repayment of the loan of Rs. 20, 00, 000/- to the petitioner which was returned from the bank on 12.08.2009 with the endorsement- 'funds insufficient'. In pursuance of the same the petitioner served a mandatory notice dated 05.09.2009 through his counsel and received the acknowledgement on 09.09.2019. He thereafter, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and the learned trial court while taking cognizance of the matter, proceeded with the trial.

3. During the course of the trial, the petitioner submitted an application under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act before the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) Court No.2, Udaipur, stating therein that the retained original copy of the notice sent by the petitioner under the signatures of advocate to the respondent No.2 as per the provisions of the N.I. Act, through registered post and the acknowledgement due, had been misplaced/lost by the advocate of the petitioner and thus implored the Court to consider the photocopy of the legal notice sent by his advocate dated 01.09.2009 as secondary evidence of the original. However, the same has been rejected by the Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) Court No.2, Udaipur vide impugned order dated 21.01.2021.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the original notice dated 05.09.2009, had been sent to the respondent No.2 and the acknowledgement of the same had been received by the petitioner's counsel on 09.09.2019 under the seal of the concerned post office. Learned counsel submitted that normally, a second copy of the legal notice is not kept as the original has been sent to the opposite party. Learned counsel further submitted that in the present case, the matter in issue is pending since 2009 and since a photocopy of the original notice is available, the same is required to be considered as secondary evidence of the original. Reliance was placed on the judgment of Pappu Singh @ Laxmansingh v. The State of Rajasthan reported in 2002 (1) Cri.LR (Raj) 566 in which even a photocopy of carbon copy has been considered as secondary evidence of the original.

5. Per Contra, Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer stating that the provision 65 of the Evidence Act is amply clear and the photocopy from no stretch of imagination can be considered at par with the original.

6. Heard.

7. The section 63 and 65 of the Evidence Act reads as under:-

"63. Secondary evidence

Secondary evidence means and includes -

(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained;

(2) copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves ensure the accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies;

(3) copies made from or compared with the original;

(4) counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them;

(5) oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it.

Section 65. Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given.-

Secondary evidence may be given of the existence, condition or contents of a document in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top