Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
AASU S/O SHRI SUMER KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 13/2024 registered at Police Station Tapukda, District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Sections 467 and 468 of IPC , the petitioners have preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The main allegation is against other co-accused Deen Mohammed, who has already been enlarge on regular bail by this court. He further submits that custodial investigation of the accused petitioners is not required. The petitioners are not the actual beneficiary to the alleged transaction but co-accused Deen Mohammed is the actual beneficiary. The petitioners were not aware that Deen Mohammed has forged the document, petitioners signed the agreement as witnesses. The matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. Petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation.
Pursuant to the interim order petitioners appeared before the concerned investigating officer, therefore the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the b
Anticipatory bail granted as custodial investigation not required; petitioners implicated as witnesses in alleged forgery, not beneficiaries.
Anticipatory bail granted when custodial investigation is not necessary and petitioners are willing to cooperate.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when custodial investigation is not necessary and the accused are willing to cooperate with the investigation.
The court granted anticipatory bail on the grounds of false implication and lack of necessity for custodial investigation, emphasizing personal liberty.
Anticipatory bail granted when accused demonstrate willingness to cooperate with investigation and no necessity for custodial interrogation is established.
The court grants anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the accused's willingness to cooperate, emphasizing that custodial investigation is unnecessary when offences are triable by ....
Anticipatory bail granted due to absence at the incident and compliance with investigation, emphasizing the need for cooperation and non-interference with witnesses.
Anticipatory bail denied due to serious allegations of fraud, necessity for custodial interrogation, and applicants' absconding status.
The court granted anticipatory bail, emphasizing the need for judicious discretion in bail applications while considering the nature of accusations and the applicant's role.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
