Nancy alias Nicky vs State of Punjab

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 225

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Nancy alias Nicky – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shivender Pal Singh
For the Respondent: Rahul Jindal
For the Complainant : Bharat Puri

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.02 dated 30.01.2026 registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 24 of the Emigration Act, 1983, at Police Station NRI, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner in connivance with other co-accused, cheated the complainant and her husband for a sum of Rs.24 lakhs, on the pretext of sending them abroad. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioner is mere employee of the company ‘Humble Overseas Consultant’ and she is not a partner in the said entity. He argued that the petitioner was neither any beneficiary of the alleged transactions, nor a single penny has been deposited in her account. He argued that the allegations are totally false and frivolous as the petitioner never assured the complainant or her husband to send them abroad. He further argued th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document