Back
SAMEER JAIN
Sanjay Choudhary S/o Shri Omprakash Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Chairman NEET (UG) Medical and Dental Admission/Counselling Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application, with amended cause title. For the reasons stated therein, the said application is allowed. Amended cause title is taken on record.
2. Considering the akin factual matrix of the instant petitions and for efficacious and expeditious disposal, the instant bunch of petitions are taken up together.
3. The lead file S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16990/2024 is filed with the following prayers (remaining petitions also have similar prayers with mutatis mutandis changes):
(ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the notification dated 23.10.2024 may be quashed and set aside to the extent of providing limited window of three hours for the purpose of document verification on 28.10.2024 and Respondents may be directed to conduct the exercise o
The court upheld the merit-based admission process while emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance by candidates.
Merit must be the exclusive criterion for admission, and technicalities should not bar deserving candidates.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the 'merit cum preference' principle for seat allotment, as well as the interpretation and application of Rule 17 of the Jammu a....
The court ruled that candidates must adhere to the selection process terms, and failure to appear for document verification despite multiple opportunities negates any claim for relief.
The admissions of the petitioners were declared unsustainable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. They were directed to participate in the special stray vacancy round of coun....
Candidates not domiciled in Uttar Pradesh must meet higher cut-off marks for Unreserved/Open category to qualify for counselling, regardless of their reservation status in their home state.
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
The court upheld the legality of the admission policy requiring non-domiciled candidates to meet higher cut-off marks for counselling, affirming that reservation claims were dissolved for such candid....
The court upheld the admission process rules, stating that a student who submits a status retention form cannot later challenge subsequent admissions, ensuring fairness in the allocation of seats.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the merit of the petitioner should have been the sole criteria for filling up the 4 reverted seats from the All India Quota, as per the Regula....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
