IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
P.S. DINESH KUMAR, T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA, JJ.
Syed Adil Bilal, S/o. Syed Nizamuddin and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Principal Secretary To Government Higher Education Department and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.21912 Of 2023 (EDN-RES)
Decided On : 07-11-2023
No specific statutes were referenced or discussed in the judgment.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners participated in multiple rounds of counselling for MBBS seats but were not successful. They approached the court alleging violation of their rights. The court passed an interim order directing their admission. The final decision is to dismiss the petition and declare their admissions as unsustainable.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the admission process, the policies of the Karnataka Examination Authority (KEA), and the directions of the National Medical Commission (NMC). It concluded that the petitioners' admissions were illegal and violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court also considered the directions of the Supreme Court in a related case and held that the petitioners should participate in the special stray vacancy round of counselling.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners' admissions were unsustainable and should be cancelled. They should be allowed to participate in the special stray vacancy round of counselling. The Medical College is directed to refund the fee paid by the petitioners.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed. Petitioners' admissions are declared unsustainable. KEA is directed to permit the petitioners to participate in the special stray vacancy round. The Medical College is directed to refund the fee paid by the petitioners.
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
(ii) Issue appropriate writ order or direction directing KEA,[Karnataka Examination Authority], second respondent herein, to hold fresh round of counselling;
(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, third respondent herein, not to admit fourth and fifth respondent herein;
(iv) Grant such other and further reliefs as are just including the costs of this petition.
2. Heard Shri. Udaya Holla, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners, Shri. N.K. Ramesh, learned Advocate for KEA, Shri. Madhusudhan Naik, learned Senior Advocate for third respondent – Medical College, Shri. Khetty for NMC[National Medical Commission] and Shri. Sudev Hegde, learned AGA for the State.
3. Though this petition is listed for completion of service on 5th respondent, Shri. N.K. Ramesh has moved I.A. No.4/2023 in the forenoon session, with a prayer to modify the interim order granted on 14.10.2023 and to permit the KEA to withdraw the seats allotted to the petitioners on the basis of the interim order and to include them in the seat matrix for the second stray vacancy round counselling commencing on 07.11.2023.
4. Shri. Holla has filed objections to I.A. No.4/2023 in the afternoon session. In view of the urgency pleaded on both sides, this petition is taken up for final disposal.
5. Brief facts of the case are, petitioners have participated in the first round of counselling for allotment of seats for first year MBBS. They were allotted seats in different Medical Colleges, but they did not choose to take those seats. Subsequently, they participated in the second and mop-up rounds of counselling, but were not successful in getting seats.
6. KEA issued a Notification dated 22.09.2023 offering un-allotted Medical seats after mop-up round in the 1st stray vacancy round to such candidates, who have not been allotted a Medical seat earlier.
7. Petitioners approached this Court by presenting the above writ petition on 21.09.2023, contending inter alia that though they were eligible for allotment of seats, candidates securing lesser marks in UGNEET -2023, have been selected in the 1st stray vacancy round; that the last date for reporting was 30.09.2023 and the candidates allotted in the stray vacancy round had not reported in the respective Colleges. Petitioners have assailed the candidature of respondents No.4 and 5 on the ground that they have obtained lesser marks than the petitioners and they could not have been allotted seats in M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, which was opted by the petitioners. It is averred that 4th and 6th respondents (candidates at Sl. Nos.76 and 78) had secured All India Ranking of 2,11,159 and 2,16,221; whereas, the and 1st and 2nd petitioners’ All India Rankings are 1,98,878 and 1,78,329 respectively.
8. Petitioners have moved this writ petition with the principal contention that allotment of seats by the KEA to the less meritorious candidates is in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
9. This Court, on 14.10.2023 has passed the following interim order:
(1) The respondent No.2 is directed to allot the petitioners to the respondent No.3 -College for 1st year MBBS course for the present academic year.
(2) The respondent No.3 -College is directed to admit the petitioners to the present academic year by permitting them to attend the class.
(
The admissions of the petitioners were declared unsustainable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. They were directed to participate in the special stray vacancy round of coun....
The court upheld the principle of merit-cum-choice in admissions, confirming that procedural fairness is essential when rectifying errors in provisional seat allotment results.
Fairness and transparency in medical seat allotment must prevail, prohibiting exclusion of meritorious candidates from the selection process.
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of preserving merit in the admission process for Post-Graduate Medical Courses, despite deviations from the admission rules and the ....
Judicial directions in admission procedures must be adhered to, and no fault should penalize eligible candidates.
Admission to Medical Colleges – Merely because seats are lying vacant, is not a ground to grant extension of time and grant further opportunity to fill up vacant seats – Process of admission and that....
The court ruled that miscommunication regarding admission status should not penalize the petitioner, allowing him to participate in the special stray vacancy round.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.