RAJENDRA BABU, G.P.MATHUR
Sakshi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
A) Issue a writ in the nature of a declaration or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring inter alia that sexual intercourse as contained in section 375 of the Indian Penal Code shall include all forms of penetration such as penile/ vaginal penetration, penile / oral penetration, penile / and penetration, finger/vaginal and finger/ anal penetration and object/ vaginal penetration;
B) Consequently, issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a direction to the respondents and its servants and agents to register all such cases f
1. S. Gopal Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (1996 (4) SCC 596)
3. Directorate of Enforcement vs. Deepak Mahajan and Another (1994 (3) SCC 440)
7. Vishaka vs. State of Raj. (1997 (6) SCC 241)
8. Lakshmi Kant Pandey vs. Union of India (1984 (2)SCC 244)
10. Mishri Lal vs. Dhierendra Nath (1999 (4) SCC 11)
15. State of Maharashtra vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003 (4) SCC 601)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.