DINESH MAHESHWARI
Heera Lal – Appellant
Versus
Mandir Shri Thakurji Sangria – Respondent
(2). This appeal was admitted on 1.12.1987 while formulating the following as substantial questions of law involved in this appeal:-
(1) Whether the learned Trial Court has committed error in striking out the entire defence of the defendant appellant for not depositing the rent of the subsequent month of March, 1981?
(2) Whether the findings of the learned lower courts on the reasonable and bonafide necessity are perverse?
(3) Whether the findings of the learned lower court are not in accordance with the provisions of Section 14(2), Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950?
(4) Whether the learned lower courts erred in holding that the provisions of sub section (5) of Section 13 are mandatory in nature?
(3). The Questions No. 1 and 4 aforesaid relate to the aspect of striking out of
2. B.P. Khemka (P) Ltd. vs. Birendra Kumar Bhowmick (AIR 1987 SC 1010)–Over Ruled.
1. Vishandas vs. Savitri Devi (1988 (1) WLN 240 = 1988 (1) RLW 365)–Over Ruled.
4. Nasiruddin and Others vs. Sita Ram Agarwal ((2003) 2 SCC 577 = RLW 2003(2) SC 315)–
5. Shiv Sarup Gupta vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta ((1999) 6 SCC 222)
6. Ram Dass vs. Ishwar Chander ((1988) 3 SCC 131)
7. Firm Kripa Ram Ganeshi Lal vs. Vijay Kumar Goyal (1986 RLW 333)
8. Gopal Dass and Others vs. Nathulal Baraya (AIR 1983 Rajasthan 222)
9. Vishandas vs. Savitri Devi (AIR 1988 Rajasthan 198)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.