Honble JAIN, J.—Though the subject matter of both the writ petitions is different, yet the land in question and parties to the proceedings are similar, therefore, on the request of learned counsel for both the parties, both the writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of finally by this common order.

CW No.2035/2008

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a Revenue Suit No.252/1985 was filed by the plaintiff-respondents, namely, Kanhaiyalal, Hazarilal and Smt. Meera Devi under Sections 88 and 89 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, in the Court of Assistant Collector & Magistrate, Jaipur (for short, the ACM) for declaration to the effect that the total area of agriculture land, bearing Khasra Nos.203 and 204, situated in Village Jhalana-Chaur, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, was 22 bigha 8 biswa, as the total area of the land has wrongly been entered as 19 bigha 4 biswa in stead of 22 bigha 8 biswa in the last settlement took place in Samvat Year 2015 (corresponding Year 1958), and, as such, the remaining land measuring 3 bigha 4 biswa could not be recorded in their names, therefore, it be declared that the plaintiffs are khatedartenants of the remaining land mea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document