SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 48

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Mathur, J
SURENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Vikash Vishnoi, Mr. N.K. Gurjar, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1.These applications for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.36/2022 registered at Police Station Chitalwana, District Jalore, for offences punishable under Sections 8/15 and 25 of the NDPS Act and Section 201 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel submitted that as per the prosecution, during nakabandi, on 13.02.2022, a team of Police Station Chitalwana recovered contraband (poppy husk/straw) weighing 112 kgs. from the petitioners. They were arrested on the spot.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 14.02.2022. They further submitted that out of total 16 cited prosecution witnesses, only 5 prosecution witnesses have been examined before competent Criminal Court. They further submitted that the delay in trial is not at all attributable to the petitioners. They submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody since last more than 3 years and looking to the pace at which trial is being conducted against the present petitioners, the same is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top