ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1.The instant revision petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 28.07.2023 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, Sangaria whereby the learned Judge framed the charges against the petitioners for offences under Sections 307 /34 , 341 /34 , 323 /34 , 324 /34 , 326 /34 IPC .

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that according to the injury report of injured Mahesh, he received three injuries in all, out of which Injury No.2 which is caused on his ring finger, is found to be grievous in nature and rest of the injuries were simple in nature. Counsel submits that all the injuries were on the non-vital part of the body of the injured Mahesh. In such circumstance, the petitioner. But the learned trial court, in a mechanical manner, has framed the charge for offence under Section 307 /34 IPC against the petitioners. Thus, the impugned order of framing charge deserves to be quashed and set aside.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for respondent No.2 have supported the order passed by the learned trial Court and contended that the injuries were caused with kasi by the petitioners, which is a sharp edged weap