Order :

1. The present revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 01.08.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jaitaran, District Pali whereby learned Judge framed the charges against the petitioners for offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 332, 353/120B IPC .

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the FIR, names of the petitioners were not mentioned and no specific averments have been made by the injured in their statements against the present petitioners. Only omnibus allegations have been made against them. Counsel further submits that no injury reports were prepared in this case. Thus, the learned trial court while passing the impugned order of framing charge has ignored the aforesaid aspects of the matter and committed grave error in framing the charge against the petitioners for the aforesaid offences. The impugned order of framing charge is per-se illegal and deserves to be quashed and set aside.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for respondent No.2/complainant have vehemently opposed the revision and submitted that the order impugned of framing charge aga